Welcome to the dynamic alternative
|
|
Abolition
of Income Tax and Usury Party |
|
Contact us: P.O. Box 28176,
Bothasig 7604, RSA -- Tel & Fax: +27 (0)21-558 2122 --
Email: info@abolishtax.org.za
Note: This "single page"
format is for your convenience -- after download you may go off-line and read at
leisure. Last update: 27 April 2006
Go directly to:
Overview | Manifesto | Awakenings | Letters sent | Letters
received | Join our
Party | Pics & Logo | 2000 Local
Elections | Election Scam
NEW: >> Poetry & Money
>> Changing the
Constitution >> The SARB's Roots >> Our Custodians? >> High Treason >> Money from Nothing
>> Debt-free Money
|
“The penalty that good men pay for not being interested in politics is to be governed by men worse than themselves.”
Plato, philosopher (427-347 BCE)
| |
OVERVIEW AND HISTORY
Back to Index
On this site you will find information concerning our Party's political
agenda and much more. But first something about us, our history and a general
overview of the South African election scene.
OURS IS THE MOST DYNAMIC
PARTY
The Abolition of Income Tax and
Usury Party is the most dynamic party in South Africa and stands
unequivocally for an Honest Money
System to replace the dishonest one now in existence.
Our Party is the brainchild of a small number of far-sighted individuals and
was first formally structured before the 1994 general elections and had the full
intention of taking part in that process. However, due to all manner of reasons,
not the least of which were the disinformation, obfuscation and seemingly
purposely orchestrated campaign to keep small parties from taking part, we found
it impossible to register the party at that time. It was therefore put on the
back burner while we cooled our heels for the ensuing five years; years which
saw a universally admitted degeneration of everything in this once relatively
prosperous, safe and contented country.
NOT EASY TO TAKE PART IN ELECTIONS IN
SOUTH AFRICA
Even with more or less
the same kind of tactics in evidence before and during the 1999 general
elections, we did in the end manage to register and take part. Of course the
rules of the "game" had changed drastically and the ruling party had entrenched
itself to such a degree that their dictates held sway. For instance, whereas in
1994 the deposit to take part at national level was R25 000, it had been
increased to R100 000 and that for participation at provincial level went up
from R5 000 to R20 000. Naturally, parliamentary rubber-stamping being what it
is, the mainstream parties weren't going to suffer too much. Arrangements were
as follows: The ruling party would receive an amount R31 500 000 from state
coffers for their election campaign (We're not counting the more than R1.2
BILLION they got for their "war chest" from foreign "questionable sources".) and
the other parliamentary parties were allocated varying amounts ranging from R10
500 000 for the official opposition party to "just" R190 000 to the last horse,
a minuscule little party run by a single man. That being the case, the
"mainstream" parties were happy to be bought off and, of course, they were
willing participants in attempting to keep other parties from also running the
race.
SHOE-STRING BUDGET
Our party found it a great hardship to scrape the money
together to pay the participation fee (R100 000) and in the end lost every cent
we paid over to the so-called "Independent Electoral Commission" (IEC) and
towards our relatively shoe-string advertising campaign to make ourselves known
to the people of South Africa. The "shoe-string" cost a "mere" R50 000 to R60
000. Even with a rand/dollar exchange rate of R7.50 for a dollar, our overseas
readers will understand that R160 000 is a lot of money to lose.
TACTICS FROM THE
ESTABLISHMENT
Of course the mainstream
parties and the media had a field day in trying to make our party seem to be
over the top as far as possible. We were, for instance, the only party ridiculed
on local radio stations and also on national television. In these cases the
local station as well as the SA Broadcasting Corporation (a state-owned entity)
saw fit to use an Afrikaans-speaking economist to "explain" to the listening and
viewing public that our party's views were "either complete madness or genius"
to paraphrase his remarks. What was obvious to a large proportion of
knowledgeable and politically astute news watchers, and politician watchers, was
the fact that these were almost the only times a "White opinion" was allowed to
be aired during the whole election and it was not favourable towards us at all.
The printed media were slightly better in carrying news of our party but they
managed to have many "typos" and misstatements slip into their reporting. Even
adverts that we paid for managed to get things screwed up unrecognizably. If we
were paranoid we would have said it was all stage-managed. The whole thing was,
of course, a farce of the first magnitude.
YOU BE THE JUDGE
As far as our policies go, you may be the judge. We
include lower down our party's Manifesto for your reading pleasure, as well as
other material, some of which were used in our media statements while others are
being printed here for the first time.
WE DID WELL UNDER THE
CIRCUMSTANCES
To complete the picture,
we can report that we managed to get 12 500 plus votes - at one stage - but this
figure was whittled down to 10 611 at the final "count". That is the official
figure. What the true figure is, is anyone's guess. If we could, we would most
certainly have liked to thank each and every one of the people who voted for us
- whether 12 500 or the lower number. They've shown us that there are still some
people who can think for themselves. And speaking of gerrymandering and other
tricks of the trade:- Most analysts and some parties (notably not the
ruling party) have come out against the election results being accurate. Some
have also stated publicly that the ruling party could not have received more
than 52% of the votes cast. It is general knowledge that an horrendous amount of
horse-play occurred before, during and after the elections. It is almost as
generally known that about 5 000 000 more votes were "counted" than cast at the
polling stations. For the so-called Independent Electoral Commission and the
many "expert" organizations who made it their business to have an opinion about
our elections, all was "fair and square" or as they normally say - "free and
fair". Of course it wasn't free - it cost a tremendous amount of money and time
lost - and it was not fair by any measurement. But c'est la vie (that's life) in
the political scene in Africa and life goes on. We are sure to do better the
next time around.
MANIFESTO
Back to Index
ABOLITION OF INCOME TAX AND USURY
PARTY
P.O. Box 28176, Bothasig 7406 RSA Tel & Fax +27
(0)21 558 2122
__________________________________________________________________
HIGHLIGHTS FROM THE
MANIFESTO
And Policy
Positions
TAXATION POLICY
-- A DYNAMIC DEPARTURE FROM THE PRESENT PARADIGM
--
Back to Index
A Short History of Income Tax, its Effects and its
Remedies
The Abolition of Income Tax and Usury Party holds that
Income Tax is a Marxist invention (point number two of the Communist Manifesto)
and should be done away with in a reconstructed South Africa functioning under a
new economic system. The system is called Zero Income Tax or Z.I.T.
Income Tax is a system of economic
enslavement
which is relatively new to
this country, only coming into use in 1914 in the greater South Africa. We are
convinced that it is a disincentive to economic growth, creating individual
misfortune and creating a social climate of dishonesty. The system today is in
chaos - many people fall outside "the net" while many others side-step it
through "legal" avoidance because they are in a position to pay for the services
of so-called tax experts. In a reconstructed South Africa the experts -
bookkeepers, tax accountants, and such - will still have work, however, and
plenty of it.
Our party's economic system will create a climate of
growth and new job opportunities will abound. Entrepreneurs and everyone else
will be empowered to earn an honest living without the present feeling of guilt
and fear of being caught out by what has become a veritable tax police. Because
there will be no taxation of income, everyone will reap the benefits of the
abundance of local skills, expertise and the fundamental wealth of this country,
something which presently is dampened by the ogre of the taxman. Entrepreneurs
and ordinary people alike will therefore create jobs for many others and
investment by people and businesses from foreign countries will clamour at South
Africa's doors to be allowed in.
The "how" of the system can briefly be explained by
saying that the state will form partnerships with bigger companies and
institutions, such as mines, corporate farming (so-called "agri-business") et
cetera. Identified conglomerate and/or monopolistic enterprises will be invited
to have the state as a partner in a similar way, for example, that Anglo
American Corporation has a partnership with Botswana in respect of their
Debswana diamond enterprise as well as their potash venture in that country, and
also with the state of Namibia with their diamond mining operation (Namdeb) in
that country along the Atlantic seaboard in what is known as the
Sperrgebiet
As far as the major mineral and precious metals mining
industries of South Africa are concerned, we also plan to become the buyer of
first resort of the output of the mines and the major, if not the only,
marketing agent. As the major producer of gold and many other minerals
(strategic and otherwise), South Africa will eventually have control over the
pricing of these commodities.
Mining companies and other large businesses that
participate in the partnership scheme will be required to invest their share of
the profits in the Republic for a period of not less than five years. This
condition will apply in respect of local as well as foreign-based companies. The
effect of this will be a lag time of five years which will benefit the
Republic's economy while not depriving investors of their legitimate returns on
investments.
EXPENDITURE TAX -- Just Another Form of Taxing Income
Back to Index
When tax on expenditure first came into being, the people of South
Africa were promised that it would replace Income Tax in due time. We all now
know this never happened and that the General Sales Tax (GST) has until today
not relieved the Income Tax burden on the people of South Africa. Over time the
then GST which started out at 4% changed into the present-day "Value Added Tax"
(VAT) at 14%.
Expenditure tax by whatever name is nevertheless also a
tax on income as it is levied on the remainder of one's income after paying
Income Tax. The Abolition of Income Tax and Usury Party will discontinue this
form of taxing income. This concept is known as "Zero Expenditure Tax" or
Z.E.T.
The Rationale behind the Z.I.T. and
Z.E.T. System (or Honest Money System)
Before 1914 what became known as South Africa (and
this goes for the independent Boer Republics as well) grew economically strong,
built harbours, roads, bridges, hospitals, and all manner of other state-owned
and serviced amenities for its people (even while being assessed for payments to
its colonial power, England) without requiring the Marxist-inspired tax on
income or its later offshoot, expenditure tax. It is therefore demonstrably
possible to do away with these forms of taxation.
All other taxes, such as excise tax, customs duty,
licenses, deposits and so forth, will continue until investigation has proved
them also to be redundant, at which time the necessary adjustments will be made.
With the system of Z.I.T. and Z.E.T. in full operation, the economy of the
Republic of South Africa will boom and continue to boom and its people will be
happy, content and peaceful as never before. The fruits of their labour, their
income, will belong to them only, and there will not be what can be termed a
parasitic government creaming off part of their labour.
----------------------------------
BANKING
POLICY
Back to Index
The South African Reserve Bank -- A Private
Bank
Full control over the functioning of the S.A. Reserve
Bank will rest with the Department of the Treasury of the government of the
Republic of South Africa. The present situation that it is owned and controlled
by individuals, designs the Act that regulates it, and sets economic policy for
the Republic, is indefensible and patently morally and ethically wrong. A
central bank which in essence is a private concern cannot be allowed to be a
player as well as the referee (see Note 3). Those serving as directors and
officials at the time the Abolition of Income Tax and Usury Party assumes power
will continue to serve until, if necessary, replaced by other officials. The
nation's Bank will be the sole provider/creator of credit out of nothing.
Note 1 The
CONSTITUTION of South Africa will entrench immutably the principle that only the
Parliament of the Republic of South Africa has the right to print and mint the
legal tender of the Republic and set monetary policy and will be charged with
monitoring the amount of currency in existence on a regular basis and adjusting
monetary policy as and when required by circumstances so as to promote stability
in the economy.
The present situation whereby South African commercial
banks as well as other entities in fact control our central bank (the S.A.
Reserve Bank) is untenable and will not be allowed to continue under the
Abolition of Income Tax and Usury Party.
Note 2 For
further reading on this subject the speeches of the late Senator Sidney J. Smith
in the Senate of the then Union of South Africa (circa 1940) are highly
recommended.
Note 3 In his
address to the seventy first annual general meeting (1991) of the SA Reserve
Bank, the then governor of the bank, Dr Chris Stals, clearly stated that the
bank is "a privately owned institution".
Other Banks
Back to Index
The charging of interest will be phased out in all spheres of
banking and the income of banks will be dependent on the service supplied and
charged for by this sector of our economy, the profits they can generate by
going into partnership arrangements with their clients and other legitimate
dealings.
Note 1 The
inter-relationship of interest charges and inflation cannot be denied, for, just
as in the case of collecting Income Tax and Expenditure Tax from the general
public, the charging of interest (usury) is the main driving force of reducing
the value of money - i.e. inflation. The view that money is a commodity, to be
bought and sold, is another value-reducing (and potentially manipulative) factor
in our economy. Both of these will be countered by the envisaged usury-free
HONEST MONEY SYSTEM to be inaugurated by the Abolition of Income Tax and Usury
Party.
Note 2 The money
supply will be effectively monitored on a regular basis so that there will be no
extended periods of over- or under-supply which are the root causes of inflation
and deflation respectively. The Abolition of Income Tax and Usury Party views
money as being important only on a national or regional basis. The value of
other currencies will therefore not play a role in determining the value of our
currency. Under these conditions there will thus be little or no interference by
other countries in setting a value on our currency unit. Any attempts by foreign
powers to influence our currency will in the first instance be countered through
economic measures.
Note 3 All
countries presently linked to our currency will be invited to follow suit and
trading arrangements presently in effect will be honoured until such time the
envisaged barter system is in full effect. Our immediate trading partners in the
rand monetary area (and postal union) will grow economically with us as the
benefits of the HONEST MONEY SYSTEM works its way through to full adulthood.
Their (and our) dependence on handouts and so-called loans and welfare from
international bodies or governments will rapidly diminish.
----------------------------------
ECONOMIC
POLICY IN GENERAL
Back to Index
The Abolition of Income Tax and Usury Party has a FREE-ENTERPRISE
POLICY. Government will exert only the absolute minimum interference with the
economy and the people will be allowed to find their own level of economic
activity.
Protection will in certain cases be afforded the
Republic's producers in line with the incentives, protections and subsidisation
policies of our major and minor trading partners.
Incentives in respect of exports (and in certain cases
imports as well) will be inaugurated to stimulate trade with other countries.
The central theme will be focussed on economic growth and self-sufficiency.
Exports of excess agricultural production as well as other produce and
manufactures will be encouraged while the importation of luxury goods (as well
as services) will be taxed for the benefit of local producers, manufacturers,
traders and service providers.
Under the Z.I.T. and Z.E.T. system primary and secondary
industries will be encouraged and the government under the Abolition of Income
Tax and Usury Party (mainly through the Department of Trade and Industry) will
concentrate on smoothing the way for all producers, traders, exporters and
importers, and levelling the playing field. The establishment and broadening of
a genuine free-market, free-enterprise, culture will be one of the highest
priorities.
So-called "free trade" will be systematically
discontinued and BARTER with our foreign trading partners will be encouraged,
thereby significantly reducing the need to maintain foreign exchange
reserves.
The Republic's continued participation in the General
Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and the later Multilateral Trade
Organization (MTO) or World Trade Organization (WTO) will be re-examined as to
its beneficiality.
So-called "loans" from the World Bank, the International
Monetary Fund as well as other international banks will be discontinued and any
existing "loans" will be repaid as expeditiously as possible.
Meddling by foreign countries, corporations and/or
individuals will be discouraged vigorously but genuine investment with no
ulterior motives will be encouraged. The laws pertaining to those individuals,
companies or governments who invest in the building of factories or the setting
up of businesses of other descrip-tion in the Republic, will be similar to those
pertaining to the mining industry - viz. a partnership arrangement with
compulsory re-investment of profits for a period of not less than five
years.
Chemical, oil and steel industries, electricity and water
supply, roads and bridge building, mass transportation, harbours, airports,
forestry and wood production, education, health, security of the state, among
others, will all to greater or lesser degree resort under state control as is
presently the case.
In respect of those industries which are wholly the
responsibility of the state (or where the state plays the major role) the
workers will share in profits. The workers will get one third of the profits
generated by such state controlled industries and the state the balance. In
cases where there are investors (local or foreign) their share of the profits
will come out of the state's portion.
Note The Abolition of
Income Tax and Usury Party has the view that the economy is important in as much
as it affects the happiness and welfare of the citizens of the Republic and it
will make every effort to facilitate this. It is an historical verity that from
the time the taxing of income came into being successive generations were
systematically led to believe otherwise. Since that time the economy became
important to governments only as a source of raising revenue while leaving the
issuance of money to private individuals or corporations (i.e. the banking
industry) to further tax citizens through usury (the non-productive charging of
interest). The disastrous results of this approach are today everywhere visible
- in high inflation or deflation, personal debt and so-called national debt, all
of which serve to impoverish citizens and the state itself.
The time to shatter the false premises that governments
should leave the issuance of money to mere individuals while it concentrates on
methods to confiscate a share of the labours, expertise and entrepreneurship of
the citizens of whom they are in reality the servants, is long overdue. The
Abolition of Income Tax and Usury Party means to set the record straight in this
regard.
---------------------------------
LEGAL
SYSTEM
Back to Index
With the Abolition of Income Tax and Usury Party in power there
will be MORE JUSTICE THAN LAW. There will be clear, simple and understandable
laws. The existing laws will be simplified and streamlined. Laws will be applied
without favour or exception across the board. The spirit of the law will
predominate over the rule of the law. Everyone will be equal under the
law.
The legal system will be made affordable and access to
legal advice will be open to all. The system of pro bono will be enlarged
to assist those citizens who cannot afford legal help. Sentenced criminals will
be employed in society as is the case in certain states of the United States of
America where chain-gangs are coming into vogue again (e.g. the state of
Arizona). Depending on the severity of their offences criminals will be placed
in service of those they had preyed upon, the communities they derive from, or
society in general.
Criminals so placed will, however, not be treated as
slaves as they too have inherent human rights. Those they serve will on the
other hand not be used as jailers. Any repeat offence or absconding from such
service will add to their terms of service and more stringent measures will be
taken to avoid such repeats.
As far as convicted murderers, rapists and drug dealers
are concerned, the Abolition of Income Tax and Usury Party would favour the
reintroduction of the death penalty as an interim measure. The present Act in
this regard which in effect rates the rights of murderers, rapists and drug
traffickers higher than those of the victims is no deterrent against such
actions and dealings, will be repealed and replaced with a more sensible Act.
The Republic's laws will be seen to be applied.
With this approach the Republic's present state of
lawlessness, virtual institutionalised corruptness and criminality as well as
the violence-prone situation, will diminish in short order.
---------------------------------
OPENNESS AND TRANSPARENCY IN GOVERNMENT
Back to Index
Under the Abolition of Income Tax and Usury Party the government
will at all times conduct itself in an open and transparent manner and, as is
the case in Scandinavian countries, citizens will have the right to inspect
anything and everything that passes through ministerial offices. The only
exception to this will be where it conflicts with matters concerning the
security of the state. All ministers and highly placed government functionaries
will be required to submit a statement of all their assets (particularly where
it concerns their own or their immediate family's shareholding in public and/or
private companies) and this will be required to be updated every three months.
Stockbrokers will be required to submit a statement of share transactions as and
when these concern such ministers and highly placed government functionaries or
their immediate families.
A statement of all gifts offered and/or received by any
of the mentioned personages. whether monetary or in another form, above a
certain minimum value, will have to be submitted for scrutiny to parliament (and
therefore the general public). If a minister or highly placed government
functionary is in breach of this stipulation he or she will be required to
resign. Failing this he or she will be instantly dismissed with seizure of at
least the so-procured assets. He or she will furthermore be arrested and stand
trial for this transgression.
--------------------------------
SECURITY OF THE
STATE
Back to Index
Defence of the State
--
Military
A well paid professional
defence force will be inaugurated. The Abolition of Income Tax and Usury Party
is against conscrip-tion. There will, however, be service to the state for a
period of six months after young adults leave school (and after they had reached
the age of 17). The Swiss model in this regard will be followed.
Due to our extensive shorelines and given our nation's
expertise in shipbuilding, the Republic can and must become a major naval
player. The SA Navy's fleet will therefore be enlarged to the level required to
service the Republic's needs in respect of defence and the protection of
maritime assets.
-- Police
The police will receive higher pay, commensurate with their
responsibilities, and their dangerous working conditions will be improved. The
increased emoluments will be over and above the real increases everyone would be
receiving as a result of the Honest Money System brought about by Z.I.T. and
Z.E.T. and the abolition of usury.
-- Self Protection
The right to defend and protect life and property will
be entrenched in the Constitution. The ownership and bearing of arms for
self-protection, sport and leisure will be an inalienable right protected by the
Constitution.
----------------------------------
FREE
ELECTRICITY FOR ALL --
Electric Power to the People
Back to Index
Just as in the case of many oil rich countries, the Republic of
South Africa has within its borders an energy source which rightly belongs to
all. In some oil rich countries, especially those bordering the Gulf, the state
supplies free education, health care (state-run hospitals and clinics) and other
services. They can do so because they consider the energy source in their soil
as a national asset. It works well even while there is sure to be some
corruption present.
In South Africa we have only a modest amount of oil, but
this country does contain vast reserves of coal, the means to generate cheap
electricity. It is this national asset, coal, which can be utilised for the good
of all at no cost other than the installation costs at point of use. The actual
supply of electricity should not be charged for at all.
As described above, under an Abolition of Income Tax and
Usury Party government utilising the Z.I.T. and Z.E.T. system the coal producing
companies (like other mining companies, etc.) will be in partnership with the
state. However, the provisions pertaining to coal companies will be adjusted so
that the state's share will be part of the production, delivered to strategic
places where it can be used or exported.
Coal producing companies will be required to deliver the
state's share of each grade of coal, some of which will be utilised to generate
electric power while others will be exported by the government to its trading
partners. In the latter case the earnings, whether in money, credit, specie or
other products or commodities, will be for the benefit of the general
population. Depending on what arrangements are arrived at, the development
and/or upkeep of power stations, as well as the reticulation of the requisite
power grid, will be facilitated by the exports.
It is envisaged that this arrangement will first and
foremost be applicable to private individuals but there is no reason why it
should not also be available to industry in general.
---------------------------------
EDUCATION
Back to Index
Schooling will be compulsory to age 16 and will be free. There
will be compulsory courses in real history, mathematics and science. In major
urban centres communities will be allowed to choose between either English or
Afrikaans as the main tuition language. The tuition language(s) of rural
communities will similarly be their choice, but due to the national need that
citizens should be prepared to function well in society, rural communities will
be allowed to choose between English or Afrikaans as their main tuition language
from grade eight (standard six). Where the numbers warrant it, all local
languages will be available as subjects in the higher classes.
The Abolition of Income Tax and Usury Party has the view
that technical training should have a high priority and that life and business
skills as well as the development of logical thinking should be similarly
prioritised.
Tertiary education will be made affordable to all
students with the required pass rates and a certain percentage of admissions
will be allocated to universities in respect of those students who cannot afford
the fees. In certain cases free universities will be established where the need
warrants it.
Private universities and colleges will be encouraged
without encumbrances or interference from the state other than the minimum
standard of tutors, where at least one of the principal members of the
institution will be in possession of the requisite minimum requirements.
Accreditation in respect of qualifications achieved at these private
institutions will be left to commerce and industry, and society in
general.
---------------------------------
JOB
CREATION
Back to Index
The Abolition of Income Tax and Usury Party does not stand for a
welfare state. With a system of Z.I.T. and Z.E.T. individuals, (the people),
will be afforded the greatest assistance in helping themselves. Education (see
separate heading) will assist everyone in preparing for a fruitful economic
life.
The state's function will be one of protection and not
prescrip-tion as far as the individual goes. Small entrepreneurs will therefore
be encouraged and job creation will be left to the people themselves.
Notwithstanding the aforementioned the state will
inaugurate voluntary programmes whereby the unemployed will be allowed to do
work in service of society in general.
---------------------------------
HEALTH
Back to Index
The cost of health care has been allowed to rise beyond the point
of affordability. The Abolition of Income Tax and Usury Party views it as an
urgent priority to make health care affordable to all of the Republic's
citizens. With the Z.I.T. and Z.E.T. systems in operation and with the benefits
of a usury-free banking industry becoming apparent, the cost of health care will
almost immediately come down.
The Abolition of Income Tax and Usury Party will invite
the Life Assurance industry to participate in building hospitals, clinics and
care centres at primary and secondary level and to make available affordable
state-of-the-art amenities and services. They may as a first step make their
clinics and hospitals available to their policyholders at reduced rates and use
this as a selling point to attract more business.
The first benefit of such a programme will be that
millions of South Africans will receive less expensive health care because they
are policyholders. The second benefit would be that other privately owned
clinics and hospitals will have to reduce their tariffs so as to compete. The
third benefit would be that sorely pressed medical aid schemes will be relieved
of excessively high claims and they will therefore be enabled to reduce their
membership rates or at the least to keep them static for longer periods of
time.
A healthy approach to living will be encouraged to be
taught from early on at school level engendering a healthy lifestyle in future
generations. Hygiene, healthy habits and physical exercise will form part of the
regimen of primary health education.
---------------------------------
WELFARE AND PENSIONS
Back to Index
Although the Abolition of Income Tax and Usury Party does not
stand for a welfare state per se it acknowledges the legitimate rights of the
aged and disabled to a quality life. State-sanctioned inflation and usury as it
has been allowed to develop within the dishonest money system have deprived most
elderly people of their life savings and destroyed their quality of life. With
the HONEST MONEY SYSTEM as advocated by the Abolition of Income Tax and Usury
Party this situation will be reversed with the result that the value of money
will increase and the cost for goods and services will fall.
All the points of this Manifesto bear out the fact that
the Abolition of Income Tax and Usury Party has it as its purpose to improve the
welfare and quality of life of all the citizens of the Republic, whether this is
in respect of Education, Health Care, Pensions or any of the other needs of
citizens.
Old age, disability and war veterans pensions will be set
and maintained at a level conducive of achieving a quality of life seldom
experienced in the Republic's past.
A State Pension Fund similar to that existing in most
European countries will be inaugurated to which all able-bodied and employed
citizens will be required to contribute for a prescribed minimum period. The
state pension so funded will become payable to all citizens upon reaching a
certain age irrespective of other assets owned by pension applicants, their
private pension provision or their level of income.
Unemployment benefits will be funded by a State
Unemployment Fund to which all able-bodied and employed citizens will be
required to contribute while gainfully employed. The deductions in respect of
this will be the responsibility of employers who will be required to remit such
collected contributions to the State Unemployment Fund. The self-employed may
choose to contribute as well. Benefits paid from this fund will be pro-rata the
contributions made but will in any event not be less than fifty per cent of the
level of income at the time of becoming unemployed. Other parameters such as the
waiting period before claiming, the duration of benefit receipt per year and so
forth will be negotiated at a later time.
A State Employment Register of the unemployed,
detailing their qualifications, experience, skills or propensities will be kept,
from which source employers will be enabled to draw their employee needs.
----------------------------------
HOUSING
Back to Index
The Honest Money System of the Abolition of Income Tax and Usury
Party will ensure that Citizens can purchase a primary dwelling with
interest-free loans. The current situation where commercial banks sometimes
charge in excess of 20%, resulting in the owner paying off the entire capital
portion of the loan in the space of three and a half years and still owning only
a small fraction of his/her property, will be disallowed with immediate effect.
Funds thus released will enhance the general wealth of the public and reduce
demands on the fiscus.
---------------------------------
THE
ENVIRONMENT AND ECOLOGY
Back to Index
The Abolition of Income Tax and Usury Party will make it a
priority to investigate, initiate and promote the use of alternative energy
sources which will not harm the environment. There are many patents in existence
for alternative sources of energy which to date vested interests have not
allowed to be implemented. The implementation and use, however, of such clean
energy sources, whether for public or private transportation or for the
inexpensive, renewable and sustainable generation of electricity and so forth,
will reduce our dependence on the fossil fuel culture which has such detrimental
effects on the environment and ecology in general. [ As
examples of what is meant here one can mention fuel efficient motor vehicles (of
which many of the relevant patent numbers are known to the Abolition of Income
Tax and Usury Party some of which have a ten-fold improvement on vehicular fuel
economy), solar power (proven technology exists), wind power, fuel cells,
battery power, flywheel or gyroscope power (as developed in Australia), and
hydro-electricity (a well proven renewable and sustainable resource). All of the
mentioned sources are to greater or lesser degree already in use but the
development and implementation of most, if not all, of them is being purposely
held back from development and universal use by vested interests. Most
importantly, most of the alternative sources of energy are environmentally very
clean sources creating few, if any, detrimental effects and they are infinitely
renewable. ]
The Abolition of Income Tax and Usury Party is not for
the proliferation of the use of nuclear power in any form. However, the safe
continued use of the sole existing nuclear power station (Koeberg) will be
allowed to the end of its useful life after which it will be safely and cleanly
dismantled.
The Abolition of Income Tax and Usury Party is for better
farming methods and less chemical abuse of our soil and water supplies. To this
end farmers and similar producers will be encouraged to apply organic farming
methods. Education in this respect will be given to our farmers, old and new,
with due emphasis on the benefits of the system of crop rotation while on the
other hand the public will be educated regarding the benefits of such production
methods for their own health and welfare. All of this will be phased in over a
relatively short period of time- say five years.
Before the go-ahead is given for the establishment of new
industries which have the potential to create pollution the aspirant
industrialists, over and above conducting the usual impact studies, will have to
sign a code of conduct in respect of their operations. Penalties will be
enforced in respect of infringements of the code of conduct and clean-ups as
well as the costs of compensation to affected parties will be for the account of
the polluters. Established companies will likewise be expected to sign the code
of conduct and if there is adequate proof that their activities are detrimental
to the communities near which they operate, companies found to be polluting or
creating a nuisance through their operations will be required to relocate to
other more suitable areas or cease their operations altogether.
The Abolition of Income Tax and Usury Party is wholly
against using any area of the Republic for the dumping of foreign-derived
hazardous, toxic and radioactive waste. Similarly the processing of
foreign-derived hazardous, toxic or radioactive waste will not be allowed under
any circumstances.
The Abolition of Income Tax and Usury Party is for the
implementation of legislation similar to that existing in the United States of
America to which end an Environmental "Super Fund" will be established in the
Republic. The "cradle to grave" as well as the "polluter must pay" approaches
will be enforced.
The Abolition of Income Tax and Usury Party puts great
value on our natural environment and has the view that it must be managed and
protected for the benefit of the existing as well as future generations in as
pristine a state as possible and that the sustainable utilization of eco-systems
are a high priority. To this end all land uses will be scrutinized and, more
specifically, national natural park areas will be either consolidated or
enlarged and where necessary managed co-operatively with indigenous
communities.
The development and promotion of so-called eco-tourism
will be a high priority.
---------------------------------
LEGAL
IMMIGRATION
Back to Index
The Abolition of Income Tax and Usury Party stands for strictly
controlled immigration. Illegal aliens will be vigorously tracked down and
repatriated humanely (see Illegal Immigration).
Immigrants with skills, expertise and proven potential
will receive priority treatment. Potential immigrants who offer only their
labour will not be highly rated. The internal excess labour must be served first
and foremost.
Immigrants who do not become naturalised citizens will be
barred from any political activity. The period required to become a South
African will be extended to TEN years and the offspring of non-naturalised
residents will not be granted automatic South African citizenship.
---------------------------------
ILLEGAL
IMMIGRATION
Back to Index
The Abolition of Income Tax and Usury Party has the view that
illegal immigrants are harmful to our economy and society in general and they
should therefore be traced and repatriated to their countries of origin. Our
borders should be guarded against the incursion of illegal immigrants. In the
case of visitors or tourists who transgress their visa requirements these should
likewise be traced and repatriated. In all cases of this nature a record of such
persons will be kept and multiple offenders will be dealt with severely, which
measures will include serving jail terms before repatriation.
---------------------------------
LOCAL
GOVERNMENT
Back to Index
As an interim step towards the envisaged free enterprise,
non-centrally controlled administration of government at every level, local
government bodies (municipalities) will be operated in line with the suggestions
in this regard which were made to the now defunct President's Council and more
specifically to those from the Bothasig Ratepayers' and Residents' Association
with the exception of their references to Income Tax other than as can be used
in a possible interim phase.
---------------------------------
SPORT AND
RECREATION
Back to Index
The Abolition of Income Tax and Usury Party will assist in
establishing a healthy approach to recreation and sport at primary level (i.e.
school level) but will refrain from active participation at all other levels
other than clearing the way for international contact. Sport should regulate
itself.
---------------------------------
FREEDOMS
Back to Index
The Abolition of Income Tax and Usury Party stands for religious
freedom, freedom of expression, freedom of association or dis-association,
freedom of movement and all the other freedoms generally accepted in democracies
world-wide. These freedoms will be entrenched in the Constitution and the Bill
of Rights.
---------------------------------
DRUG TRADE
AND DRUG ABUSE
Back to Index
Drug trafficking will be effectively countered with particularly
harsh penalties applicable to those found guilty of this heinous crime against
society and, as mentioned under "Legal System" (i.e. as an interim measure),
this will include the death penalty for convicted drug lords. Those found to be
addicted to the use of illegal drugs and other chemical substances will be
removed from society and treated in a humane way until cured of their
addiction.
---------------------------------
SECRET SOCIETIES
Back to Index
The Abolition of Income Tax and Usury Party will outlaw secret
societies. As in the United Kingdom such societies will have to register with
the government and a list of their members will have to be submitted and made
public.
No member of parliament or highly placed government
functionary may be a member of a secret society. For a candidate to be eligible
to stand for parliament a period of at least three years will have to elapse
from the time of resignation from a secret society.
---------------------------------
CAPITALISM
Back to Index
The Abolition of Income Tax and Usury Party is pro-capitalist but
anti-super capitalist, particularly when last-mentioned are developed into
monopolies.
---------------------------------
ABORTION
Back to Index
The Abolition of Income Tax and Usury Party is pro-life. Abortion
on demand will not be available without regard to other factors. Abortion will,
however, be permitted in cases where the life of the mother is at risk; in cases
of rape victims falling pregnant; in cases indicated by the medical
circumstances prevailing. The rights of the unborn child will in all cases be
taken into account.
The present Act in this regard which in effect encourages
sexual relations without responsibility and therefore the decline of the
nation's moral standards will be repealed and replaced with a more appropriate
Act.
---------------------------------
FEMINISM
Back to Index
The Abolition of Income Tax and Usury Party has the view that
females are in general more loyal and harder workers than their male
counterparts with fewer problems about sex, sports and the use of alcohol. We
believe implicitly in equal pay for equal work.
---------------------------------
PORNOGRAPHY
Back to Index
The Abolition of Income Tax and Usury Party has the view that
pornography is unhealthy for society in general and for juveniles in particular
and that it is demeaning of women. Pornography involving children is viewed as
especially pernicious and unwholesome.
For these and other reasons pornography in no small way
contributes to the moral decline of the nation and it will therefore be acted
against.
---------------------------------
ETHNICITY
Back to Index
Ethnicity is a fact of life. The Abolition of Income Tax and Usury
Party has the view that those ethnic and/or tribal or cultural groups who wish
to have territorial integrity and who can motivate such secession from a greater
South Africa on historical or juridical grounds should be allowed to do so. In
this way a peaceful confederation between the various population groups can be
realised. For example if the Zulu People wish to have their historically founded
Kwa Zulu controlled by Zulus only or if the Boers of the old Boer Republics wish
to rule themselves, it should not be denounced out of hand. Everything in this
regard is after all negotiable; especially to safeguard lasting peace.
---------------------------------
SELF
RULE OR FEDERALISM?
(Or a Combination?)
Back to Index
The rights and aspirations of certain ethnic and/or cultural
groupings within the borders of the Republic cannot be ignored for evermore.
Quite legitimate claims exist in respect of a number of these groups and their
claims and/or wishes will have to be looked at seriously if peace is to be
assured in the future.
The Abolition of Income Tax and Usury Party holds the
view that the various models that could be utilized to accommodate and/or
satisfy the dissatisfied groups have not been exhaustively explored and that
something can be worked out to satisfy the legitimate wishes and aspirations of
the affected ethnic and/or cultural groupings.
Failure to bring this contentious issue to a satisfactory
conclusion will create national problems for many decades if not centuries (e.g.
as in the case of the Basques and the Irish). Ignoring the issues will not make
them go away and the only way in which they can otherwise be managed would be
through state oppression and state-sanctioned propaganda as is quite evident
today. However, this latter route which amounts to police-state rule, has not
worked anywhere in the world to eradicate legitimate claims; they always
resurface with a vengeance.
The Abolition of Income Tax and Usury Party cannot say
whether accommodation will be through the granting of self-rule or federalism.
This will have to be negotiated with the affected groupings. It may very well be
that some may choose self-rule and others, ederalism; while yet others may
choose a combination of these and/or other concepts.
Back to Index
FAMOUS QUOTATIONS
WHAT OTHERS HAVE SAID ON THE
SUBJECT OF AN HONEST MONEY SYSTEM
"... Government cannot refrain, any more than can the
wage-earner and producer and retailer from stoking the fires of inflation by
ever-mounting fiscal demands and imposts. Ours it is argued, is a system -- the
result of historical processes -- which automatically and progressively
accumulates capital charges as capital expenses. Under it any expansion of the
money supply can only be achieved at the price of higher taxes to service and
repay the loans which are the source of the increased money supply or by service
charges on increased industrial equipment. Yet, with a paper currency now almost
wholly divorced from dependence on precious metals there is nothing -- except
the vast vested interest which has grown up during the centuries round the
existing system of creating money -- to prevent the State from bringing new
capital into existence free of interest charges. lf common sense were the only
criterion, it would seem a more sensible way of doing so for Government, at the
beginning of each financial year or other accounting period to estimate the
growth potential of the economy and create an equivalent amount of new interest
free money with which to pay the public services instead of as at present,
extracting from the taxpayer the wherewithal to do so and pay the accruing
interest on it -- a process which automatically increases inflation and tends to
discourage individual initiative. Under the seemingly revolutionary, yet simple
system I advocate, the burden of taxation would be reduced every year by the
estimated growth potential of the economy. The stimulating effect on the
production of such a general reduction of taxation, would I believe, be
dynamic."
------------
Sir Arthur Bryant in his
regular column in The Illustrated London News of February 1973. His words
still hold true today.
_______________________________________
"At the moment the Reserve Bank has the nation's gold. But when I was the
Chairman of the Finance Committee of the Durban Municipality, this thought
occurred to me: 'Here is the Durban Corporation with £10,000,000 of real assets
over liabilities; machinery, land, buildings and we, its citizens, must borrow
from a bank that has not £l,000,000 of capital in the country. We have to pledge
our real assets and turn them into a municipal debt.' I realised the impudence
and the iniquity of it and that is why I say that all municipal and provincial
finance should be controlled by a State institution.
"I have deliberately not used vague labels. I have not talked glibly of a
'State Bank.' If you had a State Bank in South Africa and it was under the
present Minister, we would have no more than another branch of Barclay's
Bank."
------------
Thus spoke Senator Sidney J. Smith (Labour Party) in the Union
Senate, April 1944. Senator Smith was the Senate's youngest member at the time
of his election, being then only 38 years of age. A member of the Durban Town
Council in 1922, at the age of 21, he was the youngest Councillor in the Union's
history. Elected to the Natal Provincial Council in 1933, at 32 years of age, he
was probably the "infant" member at that time.
He was an active member of the South African Labour Party since 1919, having
held many Organising and Executive positions within the Party. He gave much of
his time to a study of the Financial and Monetary Systems and appropriately
enough did at least three terms as Chairman of the Finance Committee of the
Durban City Council.
Senator Smith's Senate speeches advocating an Honest Money System for South
Africa were considered so important that he found much acclaim both near and
far. Many overseas journals published his speeches. His words still hold true
today.
Back to Index
POETRY AND MONEY
By NOEL
STOCK.
( First published in July / August 1959 )
ALBERTUS MAGNUS, saint and doctor of the Church, one of the great figures in
the history of man’s struggle for knowledge, sought “concrete, specific,
detailed, accurate knowledge concerning everything in nature”. All civilisation
and culture has been built up by a few men using their eyes and minds to
collect, examine and compare natural phenomena; and out of a perfecting and/or
refining of this process has come real knowledge, not only the knowledge of the
scientist but of the poet, painter, philosopher, architect. Whenever the scholar
of today sees more of the world than his predecessor, it is partly at least
because he is standing on the shoulders of his predecessor.
The tragedy of our civilisation has been the separation of monetary economics
from general literary culture. Some of the best poets and thinkers through the
ages have concerned themselves with money, banking, usury and the root
meaning of these things, but the power of putrefaction, by a number of fairly
well-defined steps and some others not so well-defined, managed to split the
culture long before there was any obvious sign of fragmentation.
Not by mere accident but by a combination of sloth and malice the education
system has turned men’s minds to believe that poets, almost of necessity, have
no concern with reality. Whereas, in fact, the best poetry is deeply rooted in
reality, and poets have played an important part in passing on monetary
knowledge.
The biologist does not bring out two thousand slides or specimens every time
he wishes to make a general statement, he simply picks out a few examples
which illustrate something present in all his slides, something which applies in
all cases. This method I will use here.
THE CLASSICS
Classical studies have been murdered in order to blot
out a matter of forty facts of history. The classics have been thrown out, not
because they are dull but because they are too interesting for the comfort
of the Grand Masters of usury who subsidise and control our university and
education system.
Aristotle in the 4th century B.C. described the basic technique of monopoly
in his Politics (1.4/5). A student who understands Aristotle on monopoly
will have no difficulty in understanding the monopolies of his own day.
Aristotle also provided a splendid working definition of money in the
Nichomachean Ethics where he says that it is human regulation - not some
intrinsic value in the metal - that makes a coin into money. For money “is
called nomisma (customary currency), because it does not exist by nature
but by custom (nomos), and can be altered and rendered useless at will.”
We note in passing that where Aristotle used the word demand in writing
of price, the translator of the Loeb edition substituted the word value, not, I
dare say, because he was a direct pimp for the Usurocracy but because he had
been educated in ignorance of economics. We have no means of knowing how many
young men have been thrown off the scent by that one mistranslation.
MURDER?
Cicero was concerned with usury and the outflow of gold
from Rome, Cleopatra wrote about currency, Pythagoras “made the coinage”. Cato
in De Re Rustica has this piece of dialogue:
|
“And what do you think of usury?”
“What do you think of murder?”
| |
For a long period the Romans valued their money for its usefulness and
efficiency in measuring the prices of commodities and services. They were not
obsessed by metallic content and saw that the essence of money is in the amount
of it in circulation. The emperor Antoninus Pius (2nd century A.D.) pondered the
difference between the agrarian usury of Rome and the maritime usury of Rhodes,
not in an academic way but as it affected his people. He said that “Money had
more to do with the distemper of the Roman Empire than the Huns and the
Vandals.”
St. Ambrose of Milan, in the 4th century, cried out against monopoly, and in
his De Moribus Brachmanorum very neatly placed his finger on the shepherd
or “butchers of lesser cattle” mentality. Among the troubadors of Provence in
the early Middle Ages was one Piere Cardinal who used to go about the country
singing of oppression and corruption. Barons make war, he said, for their own
profit, regardless of the peasant.
Dante consigned usurers to hell, to the same circle of hell as the sodomites,
because both are against nature, against natural increase. This was the teaching
of the Church in the Middle Ages.
Shakespeare held to the same teaching, and like Dante got to the root meaning
of usury as something against nature. That is what The Merchant of Venice
is “all about”. Shylock wants more than hand or foot, he wants to end Antonio’s
natural increase. Shakespeare saw that gold, unlike wheat or sheep, does not
increase by natural process, and he clarified the natural division between
animal and vegetable on the one hand, and mineral on the other. “Is your gold .
. . ewes and rams?” he asked.
BLEST PAPER CREDIT !
The formation of the Bank of England
in 1694 ushered in a new phase of the war between “usury and the man who wants
to do a good job”. This phase, which is still going on, is based upon the
creation of money out of nothing.
Alexander Pope, smeared as a bitter eccentric - a “logical” description, I
suppose, for anybody looking at him through the perverted and perverting haze of
“Whig history” - had a good grip on reality, as these lines show:
|
Blest paper credit ! last and best supply
! That lends corruption lighter wings to fly !
Gold imp’d by thee, can compass hardest things, Can pocket
states, can fetch or carry kings.
| |
Dr. Johnson also managed to throw a little light on mortgages and
“everlasting debt”. I wonder how many students of so-called “philosophy” have
attempted to discover the truth or otherwise of David Hume’s statement that
manipulators “adopt a hundred contrivances, which serve no purpose but to check
industry, and to rob ourselves and our neighbours of the common benefits of art
and nature”? George Crabbe kept his eye on things and produced some excellent
verses, but it was Byron who pinned down his age in Don Juan with the
question, “Who hold the balance of the world?" and the answer:
"Rothschild and Baring”.
THE COLONIES
Strands of this tradition reached out to the
colonies. “Scrutator” wrote lucidly about banking tricks in the Australian
Sydney Herald of November 24, 1842: “As well might the Government confer
the power to levy taxes on the community to a company of consuming adventurers”.
About the same time the Hobart Town Courier stated that the Tasmanian
legislative council had refused a legal limit of 10 per cent because “The
president and several of the Council are money lenders, some of them of the
first water”.
Browning tried to keep to meaningful or at least adult matter in Inn
Album and Ford Madox Ford, Chesterton, Belloc and even Bennett all tried,
with varying degrees of success, to get back some of the old teaching or to warn
against “the system.
I think it is clear from the foregoing that when Mr. Eliot rhymed “Sir Alfred
Mond” with “exchequer bond” he was not being “modern”, but simply going about
the true business of the poet which is to record realities, in language charged
with meaning “to the utmost possible degree”.
Mr. Pound has given money a central place in both his poetry and prose,
because he has discovered that money is one of the keys to history.
ABOLITION OF INCOME TAX AND USURY
PARTY
P.O. Box 28176, Bothasig 7406, RSA Tel & Fax +27
(0)21 558 2122
_______________________________________
Back to Index
MORE QUOTATIONS
A FEW STATEMENTS BY PROMINENT
PEOPLE ON THE TOPIC OF MONEY AND CREDIT:
"All the perplexities, confusions and distress in America
arise, not from defects in their Constitution or Confederation, not from want of
honor or virtue, so much as from downright ignorance of the nature of coin,
credit and circulation."
John Adams, 1787. [
After two hundred years the "perplexities, confusions and distress" still exist.
What do our people really know about money and credit? ]
"If the American people ever allow private banks to
control the issue of their currency, first by inflation and then by deflation,
the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people
of all property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent
their fathers conquered."
Thomas Jefferson, 1816.
[ No wonder then that the mighty USA now harbours millions upon millions of
street people and trailerpark dwellers - a veritable new class of people.
]
"Can anything be more absurd than that a nation should
apply to an individual to maintain its credit and, with its credit, its
existence as a state, and its comfort as a people."
Lionel Rothschild, as cited by Benjamin D'Israeli, 1844. [ For
what reason do governments not create money and credit themselves? By carefully
crafted ignorance and unnecessary "perplexities and confusions" by "the opinion
and duress of small groups of dominant men." ]
"Whoever controls the volume of money in any country is
absolutely master of all industry and commerce."
James A. Garfield. (1831-1881) 20th US President.
"A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of
credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation,
therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men…. We have come
to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and
dominated Governments in the civilized world -- no longer a Government by free
opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but
a Government by the opinion and duress of small groups of dominant men."
Woodrow Wilson. (1856-1924) 28th US Pres.
"He [the Banker] keeps everything over and above his cost
of rent, help, advertising and white carnations. He created money and reaped
where he did not sow. This is the so-called credit money. Would you not like to
be in the banking business and be able to create ten [or twenty] times as much
money as you really have and lend it out at interest at 5%?" [up to 32% in the
RSA]
(anon.)
"There can be no Freedom without Economic Freedom and
there can be no Economic Freedom without Freedom from Income Tax and
Usury."
Slogan of the Abolition of Income Tax and
Usury Party, 1999.
Back to Index
TOWARDS DEFINING
INCOME
TAX

An early cartoon lambasting the impost of Income Tax: a cumbersome
weight hung around the neck of the hardworking population while benefiting the
lazy, the ignorant, and the unscrupulous -- and, of course, the rapacious,
all-devouring, bankers!
_______________________________________
Isn't it strange that in all the years of the
existence of Income Tax (since 1914 in the greater South Africa) this form of
theft has yet to define its underlying basis - that is, INCOME.
The
argument of what is and what isn't Income, is from the inception of Income Tax
an ongoing theme of the enslavers of mankind. It is an oddity - an aberration of
logic - that the word "income" is indeed defined in a negative way - by defining
what portions of one's income do not constitute, or rank, as income, and
therefore are exempted from this tax. For instance, the so-called "capital
gains" which are presently being looked at in a serious way by the Katz
Commission.
A deadline (or target date) has even been set for the
implimentation of the so-called "capital gains tax" by which date certain (still
not fully defined) property will have to be valued and a certain portion of any
increase in value (so far 25% has been mentioned) from this date to the eventual
sale of such property will be taxed.
Of course the powers behind this
further erosion of our liberties, know full well that government-caused and
bank-caused inflation will contribute the most to such increase in "value". In
other words, while our currency rapidly depreciates in value the numbers get
bigger, and therefore there is an apparent increase in value. What it really
means, is that our property value essentially remains at the same level but the
number of rands it takes to replace it, goes up. And the reason for this is that
the banks create too much money (including credit) at times which causes
inflation. (At other times the banks can as easily decrease the amount of money
[and credit] in circulation causing deflation.)
During an inflationary
phase, such as we are in at present, the "value" of property "increases" rather
rapidly and therefore it is almost impossible not to have an "increase" by the
time one sells such property. And thus "capital gains tax" is assured of
becoming a lucrative extension of the Income Tax.
As will have become
clear by now to the reader, Income Tax and Expenditure Tax are two methods of
state-sanctioned theft of the labour of
ordinary citizens. They are basically the same thing. While Income Tax grabs a
part of your earnings from your labour and risk-taking when you first earn it,
Expenditure Tax grabs a further portion when you spend what is left. Even if you
put your money away for extended periods, it will be taxed by way of Expenditure
Tax at some stage or another when it is finally spent.
As stated
previously, Income Tax was in the recent history of the world the brainchild (so
it is purported) of the arch communists, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, who
made it point number two in their "Communist Manifesto".
What we
are saying is that if the money (and credit) creation process is returned to its
proper place, i.e. as a function of the state on behalf of all its citizens,
then there would be no need at all for any government to confiscate part of the
earnings of the citizens they are supposed to protect.
Income Tax /
Expenditure Tax working together in lock step with the bankers' monopoly of
dishonest money creation (and destruction) is the basis of the dishonest money
system.
If and when the money creation process is returned to its
rightful place -- and consequently Income Tax and Expenditure Tax (and "capital
gains" tax, as well as many other related confiscations) are abolished -- then
we would see the fruits of the Honest Money System, i.e.,
Progress and Prosperity.
Until that time it is our manifest
duty to counter this monstrous injustice and to free ourselves from its
shackles. And to accomplish this we need to unlearn what has been taught us over
the years - decades and centuries - in such an unscrupulous way by those who
wish for us to stay enslaved. Towards that end the reader will find much that is
good in the books listed further on.
Please use the system of
"each-one-teach-one" to spread the word and help us bring Truth and
Honesty back to South Africa and the world by voting for the candidates of the
Abolition of Income Tax and Usury Party.
|
NOTE: -- Since
the above was written the infamous confiscatory "Capital Gains Tax"
came into being with effect from 1 October 2001. The people have
once more been duped and forced into a system they basically do not
understand -- and that goes for virtually all of the "captains of
industry", the financial pundits, and the rest! And, of course,
though a big show was put up to make "the process" appear above
board and "open and transparent", this was hardly the case. The
wielders of power wanted to enslave us, the people, even more -- and
this they did with consumate ease!
| |
Back to Index
Back to Index
CUSTODIANS OF THE NATION'S
FINANCIAL RESERVES,
OR RIP-OFF ARTISTS?
An article from "Cape Town - The Golden Jubilee of Greater Cape Town"
Published by John R. Shorten, 1963. (Pages 289 to 291).
(Uploaded 27 June 2002)
Custodians Of The Nation’s Financial Reserves
The SOUTH AFRICAN RESERVE BANK
AT THE END of the First World War, South Africa’s financial position was
characterised by a number of unsatisfactory features. Some of the contributory
factors had existed for many years, but others, in turn, originated during the
war and had been sharply intensified by the stresses and strains of that
difficult period.
From 1914, when the sterling-dollar rate was pegged at 4.76 dollars to the
pound, the Bank of England purchased the entire output of the South African gold
mines at the fixed price of 85s. an ounce. However, early in 1919 sterling again
became freely convertible whereupon the pound immediately began to depreciate in
relation to the dollar, with the result that the agreement with the Bank of
England for the sale of South African gold was terminated in July of that year.
By the end of the year the rate of exchange stood at approximately 3.85 dollars
to the pound. This meant an appreciation in the price of gold in terms of
sterling. From 85s. an ounce the price rose to 105s. and then to 127s. in
February, 1920.
Gold Flowed Out
In those days there was no central bank in South
Africa. The commercial banks issued their own notes which they were obliged to
redeem in gold on demand. Since the fiction officially persisted that South
Africa was still ‘on gold’, the banks themselves had to quote the South African-
London exchange rate on the basis of parity with sterling. Thus, to meet their
commitments relative to their note issues, the banks were forced to buy gold
coin in London at a rising premium, for although an embargo had been placed on
the export of gold coin from South Africa, the temptation offered by a premium
of almost ten shillings on every sovereign that could be sent out of the country
was too great to be resisted. There was smuggling on a large scale.
In these circumstances the banks appealed to the Government to suspend the
relevant section of the Banking Act which made their notes convertible into
gold. That meant, of course, that they were asking for the suspension of the
gold standard itself.
The Government, for its part, was acutely conscious of the position and the
added danger existing in the lack of uniformity where the issue of banknotes was
concerned whereby there was a possibility of an over-issue of notes under the
ordinances of certain Provinces. This situation gave rise to fears, based on
experience, that the inflation which had resulted from the war would be followed
by an undue restriction of credit once the cyclical movement turned downwards.
These and other considerations all pointed to the need for a central bank which
could stabilise and safeguard the country’s financial reserves by assuming
responsibility and leadership in the currency and banking field.
The Establishment of the Reserve Bank
In 1919 the Government
responded to the entreaties of the commercial banks by calling a conference at
which the then Minister of Finance, Mr. Henry Burton, presided, its purpose
being to decide ‘. . . by a free exchange of views the best ways of safeguarding
the interests of South Africa and placing its currency on a natural basis’.
The general managers of the various banks and representatives of the gold
mining industry attended the conference which resolved, but not by a very large
majority, ‘. . . that the establishment of natural exchanges and a free market
for gold in the Union is desirable and that to this end a mint and a refinery be
set up’.
The Government then decided to invite Mr. Henry Strakosch (afterwards Sir
Henry), the managing director of The Union Corporation Limited in London and a
world authority on foreign exchanges, to visit the country and act as an
adviser. There is no doubt that Mr. Strakosch’s views had a profound influence
on subsequent legislation in connection with the establishment of a central bank
in South Africa.
It was his opinion that it would be impossible to remove the embargo on the
export of gold without wrecking the country’s economy. He suggested an ingenious
alternative whereby the Union was able temporarily to slide off the gold
standard without openly acknowledging that it had done so. His proposal was that
gold coins should be taken out of circulation and replaced by inconvertible
‘gold certificates’. It was an accepted feature of the scheme that these
certificates would be issued with the object of preserving the country’s gold
reserve and that their inconvertibility was temporary. In other words, they
would be redeemed in gold once circumstances permitted the restoration of the
gold standard itself.
Above all, Henry Strakosch insisted on the amendment and consolidation of the
South African Banking laws, and the establishment of a central reserve bank
charged with the task of setting the discount rate.
The Government accepted these recommendations and drafted three Bills to give
them effect. One of these was a measure to establish the South African Reserve
Bank.
All aspects of the problem, and the Government’s proposals for dealing with
it, were then referred to a Select Committee. Finally, the proposals for issuing
gold certificates and for the establishment of the Reserve Bank were presented
to Parliament as one consolidated measure. Though there were dissentients on
both sides of the House the Bill, now known as The Currency and Banking Act of
1920, was passed on the 10th of August of that year.
In July, 1921, the South African Reserve Bank opened its doors. At about the
same time the mining companies established the Rand Refinery at Germiston and in
1923. A branch of the Royal Mint began operations in Pretoria.
The Statutes
The Currency and Banking Act laid down the statutes
under which the bank was to operate. It was to be a privately-owned institution
with an initial capital of £1,000,000 to which the commercial banks were obliged
to subscribe in proportion to their own paid-up capital and reserve funds,
though they were debarred from holding more than half of the total between them.
Stock to the value of £700,000 was made available to the public at par, but no
stockholder, other than the Treasury or a subscribing bank, could acquire
holdings in excess of £10,000, it having been laid down that the Treasury itself
should take over at par any stock which was not taken up. Initially, public
participation amounted to only £379,200, but the Treasury kept the lists open
and the full sum of £700,000 was finally subscribed by individuals.
The commercial banks were also required to maintain reserve balances with the
Reserve Bank equal to at least ten per cent of their demand liabilities in South
Africa and three per cent of their time liabilities to the public.
The Reserve Bank was granted the sole right to issue banknotes in South
Africa. This note issue was to be secured by a gold reserve of not less than
forty per cent, the balance to be accounted for by trade bills and other
securities.
It was charged with the duty of fixing the rate at which it would discount
various types of bills, thus establishing a South African Bank Rate as a
yardstick for the commercial banks and other financial institutes.
Among a great many other provisions that define the functions of the bank the
Act specifically debars it from taking part in transactions which are the normal
business of commercial banks.
There were to be eleven directors on the Board of the Reserve Bank of whom
six were to be nominated by the stockholders. The other five, including the
Governor and Deputy Governor, were to be Government nominees. It thus was
provided that the institution’s affairs should not necessarily be controlled by
the government of the day.
Mr. W. H. Clegg, Chief Accountant of the Bank of England, accepted the
appointment as first Governor of the South African Reserve Bank. He was
succeeded by Mr. J. Postmus, who in turn was succeeded by Dr. NI. H. de Kock in
1945 who guided the affairs of the bank for seventeen years. On his retirement
as Governor in 1961 the present Governor, Mr. Gerard Rissik, was appointed. Dr.
de Kock, however, remains the Chairman of the Board which now consists of twelve
directors, half of whom, including the Governor and two Deputy Governors, are
appointed by the Government, the remaining six being men who are representative
of finance, commerce, industry and agriculture. All directors must be resident
in South Africa.
The Advantages of a Central Reserve
In practice the bank’s
constitution has enabled a successful combination to be effected between State
control of monetary policy on the one hand and the advantages of a privately
owned central bank on the other.
The bank’s sole right of note issue has ensured uniformity in the
circulation. The commercial banks, which are today required to maintain reserve
balances with the bank equivalent to ten per cent of their demand and three per
cent of their time liabilities to the public, soon discovered the advantages of
maintaining their free cash balances with the central bank as well. Not only did
this procedure facilitate the settlement of inter-bank clearing balances, but it
also enabled the commercial banks to make more efficient use of their resources
as a result of the re-discount and advance facilities which could be obtained
from the central bank itself.
At an early stage of its career, therefore, the bank had assumed the
recognised central banking functions of responsibility for the note issue, as
custodian of the cash reserves of the commercial banking system and central
clearing institution, and, of course, from the start it was prepared to act as
lender of last resort by way of loan facilities against commercial,
agricultural, and Treasury bills and Government stocks.
Purchase of Gold
The assumption of these functions contributed to
the Reserve Bank becoming the custodian of South Africa’s gold reserves, a
position which was strengthened by arrangements concluded in 1925 whereby it
purchased the gold output and attended to its disposal. As gold occupied the
predominant place among exports, this arrangement also enabled the bank to
assume the leading role in the country’s exchange market.
From an early stage the bank has determined the exchange rates for sterling.
The control of these rates, in turn, has enabled it to influence the rates
quoted by the commercial banks for other currencies. With the development of
trade and financial relationships with the United States, Canada, Switzerland,
Italy and Germany, the bank has come to quote directly for the currencies of
these countries as well, thus ensuring the public of fine rates in prevailing
circumstances. When the need arose the bank also entered the forward exchange
market in these currencies.
Another recognised central banking function was assumed in 1927 when the bank
took over the Government accounts from the commercial banks and thus became its
banker. Subsequently, the accounts of the provincial administrations and those
of certain statutory organisations were also transferred to the bank.
Forty-Two Years of Growth
Today the bank operates nine branches.
These are situated in Pretoria, where the head office is also located,
Bloemfontein, Cape Town, Durban, East London, Johannesburg, Pietermaritzburg,
Port Elizabeth and Windhoek.
In the conduct of its varied activities it naturally has become very
thoroughly acquainted with economic conditions within the Republic and overseas
and has developed close contacts with a number of the leading foreign countries.
Automatically, therefore, it also has functioned as the Government’s consultant
and agent in a large number of appropriate matters such as the repatriation of
Government stocks from overseas during the war years. It administers the
exchange control system in the Republic on behalf of the Treasury and acts as
agent for the Government in its operations with the International Monetary Fund
and in connection with loans granted to South Africa by banks in the United
States, Switzerland, Italy and Germany.
The Reserve Bank’s first weekly statement, issued on the 2nd July, 1921,
reflected assets equivalent to R11,876,305. At the end of December, 1962, assets
stood at R568,600,275 and advances, investments and discounts totalled
R113,751,736. Liabilities in respect of notes in circulation amounted to
R275,491,305 and deposits to R249,192,017.
The statutes of the Bank have been amended in several important respects
since it was founded. These amendments have been effected so as to give it more
scope and flexibility in meeting the needs a of developing country under
changing world economic conditions. In 1944 the laws governing its operation
were consolidated in the South African Reserve Bank Act of that year. However,
there have been no fundamental changes of a constitutional nature.
Today, the bank is still a privately owned institution with nearly a thousand
individual stockholders, some half of whom hold less than R1,000 of stock each.
Annual dividends are restricted to ten per cent, the balance of the net profits
being allocated in a small part to the general reserve fund and in the main to
the Government and so, indirectly, to the people of South Africa.
--- END OF ARTICLE ---
(Don't write us that we have NOT allowed you full insight into the
workings of "spin". NL)
Back to Index
Money power
High Treason!
Wing Commander Leonard Young examines the vital connection between credit
creation and national sovereignty
(First published: January 1997)
(Uploaded 30 June 2002)
THE foundation of the Bank of England, in 1694, was perhaps the
single most significant event in the history of Britain, if not the modern
world. For it created the mechanism by which the Crown and Parliament of what
was to become the greatest empire ever seen were subordinated to the power of
Gold, so that monarchs and politicians were little more than puppets in the
hands of shadowy financiers. However much the court historians of the
Establishment focus on the drama of all the wars and economic booms and busts
which followed, the central historical fact is that they were largely the result
of this enthronment [sic] of what is best described as 'the Money Power'.
This disaster came about at the end of the seventeenth century, when William
III needed a great deal of money to pay for his wars in Europe. A group of
financial sharks, led by one William Patterson, agreed to lend the king the
money, in exchange for the right to found a private bank with the grand - though
wholly inaccurate - title of the Bank of England. They knew precisely what they
were doing; in the initial prospectus for potential investors, Patterson stated
openly that "the Bank hath benefit of interest on all moneys which it creates
out of nothing." And right from the start, the new bank lent the king money,
far in excess of its gold reserves, at eight per cent interest.
This is what the banking system has been doing on all loans ever since. But
although the banks issue credit to cover the amount of the loan, they do not
issue credit to cover the interest on it. The result of this is that the public
is continually being driven further and further into irredeemable debt to the
banking system. The National Debt keeps rising, and cannot do otherwise under
the system in force, and the same is true of private debt, resulting in repeated
waves of bankruptcies, and widespread poverty in the midst of unprecedented
plenty and productive capacity.
|
"Banks lend credit. They create the means of
payment out of nothing." (14th Edition, Encyclopaedia
Britannica.)
(NOTE: Credit is NOT money.)
| |
During the seventeenth century, the kings of England had given the American
colonies the right to create their own money. Towards the end of the following
century, the London-based financiers realised that the fast-expanding New World
offered rich pickings. So their corrupt placemen in parliament passed laws
forcing the colonists to give up the issue of their own money and to borrow
book-entry money at interest from the new Bank of England. According to Benjamin
Franklin, this was the main cause of the American War of Independence. This was
why the Founding Fathers laid down in the American Constitution that Congress
should have the power to coin money, and to regulate the value thereof, in order
to save their people from coming under the dominion of Finance. In spite of
this, Alexander Hamilton fooled George Washington into letting him set up a
"Bank of the United States", with the result that the Money Power rapidly gained
growing influence in America as well. Within a decade, Thomas Jefferson, the
third US President, was moved to declare that:-
|
"I believe that banking institutions are more
dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. Already they have
raised up a money aristocracy that has set the Government at
defiance The issuing power (of money) should he taken from the banks
and restored to the Government and to the people to whom it belongs.
If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue
of their currency, first by inflation and then by deflation, the
corporation that will grow up around them will deprive the people of
all their property until their children will wake up homeless on the
land their fathers conquered."
| |
While the rulers of Britain were overwhelmingly prepared to sell their souls
and their people to the Money Power, successive American leaders kept up the
fight against the tyranny of Gold. Abraham Lincoln, US President from l861-65,
is quoted on page 91 of Senate Document No. 23, 76th Congress, as
saying:-
|
"The Government should create, issue and circulate
all the currency and credit needed to satisfy the spending power of
the consumers. The privilege of creating and issuing money is the
supreme prerogative of Government, the Government's greatest
creative opportunity."
| |
It was Lincoln who, during the Civil War, made the following statement to
Congress:-
| "I have two great
enemies, the Southern Army in front of me and the financial
institution in the rear. Of the two, the one in my rear is my
greatest foe."
| |
It was the desire of the 'financial institution' to gain control of the South
which was the real cause of the Civil War; the slavery issue was only a
propaganda smokescreen.
Bismarck knew the truth about this terrible conflict and explained it to
Conrad Siem in 1876. His statement was published in La Vieille France,
page 216, in March 1921. Maintained Bismarck:-
|
"The division of the United States into federations
of equal force was decided long before the Civil War by the
financial powers of Europe. These bankers were afraid that the
United States, if they remained in one block and one nation, would
attain economic and financial independence, which would threaten
their financial domination of the world. The voice of the
Rothschilds predominated. They foresaw tremendous booty if they
could substitute two feeble democracies, indebted to the financiers,
for the vigorous Republic, which was practically self-supporting.
Therefore, they started their emissaries in order to exploit the
question of slavery and thus to dig an abyss between the two parts
of the Republic. Lincoln never suspected these underground
machinations. He was against slavery and he was elected as such. His
character prevented him from being the man of one party. When he had
affairs in his hands, he perceived that these sinister financiers of
Europe wished to make him the executor of their designs... His being
a candidate had not troubled them; they thought to easily exploit
the woodcutter. But Lincoln read their plots and understood that the
South was not the worst foe, but the financiers."
| |
After the war, Lincoln was determined to set up a constitutional money
system, as proposed by the Founding fathers, for he realised the ultimate fate
of the nation if bankers were allowed to dominate. As he struggled to set up an
honest money system, the London newspapers - which moulded opinion on behalf of
the bankers - expressed great fear over his proposals. The Times was
particularly frank:-
|
"If that mischievous financial policy which had its
origin in the North American Republic during the late war in that
country should become indurated down to a fixture, then that
government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off
its debts and be without a debt. It will have all the money
necessary to carry on its commerce. It will become prosperous beyond
precedent in the history of the civilised governments of the world.
The brains and the wealth of all countries will go to North America.
That Government must be destroyed, or it will destroy every monarchy
on the globe."
| |
The Times' lying and clever appeal to the old ruling elite who had
become the debtors of the Money Power was also, of course, a remarkably
incautious confession of the efficacy of the 'greenbacks' - currency notes spent
into circulation by Lincoln's government without the backing of either gold or
bankers' credit.
If Lincoln had succeeded in following up the success of this policy, the
resulting prosperity of the US, and the reason for it, would have become obvious
to other nations, where pressure would also have grown for the casting off of
the shackles of debt slavery. In the event, of course, he was assassinated.
Bismarck made the following statement regarding his murder:-
|
"The death of Lincoln was a disaster for
Christendom. There was no man in the United States big enough to
wear his boots, and.... (money creators) went anew to grab the
riches of the world. I fear that foreign bankers, with their
craftiness and tortuous tricks, will entirely control the exuberant
riches of America, and use it to plunge the whole of Christendom
into wars and chaos in order that the earth should become their
inheritance."
| |
In spite of their growing power, it took the financiers another generation to
complete their conquest of America. But in December 1913, while most of the
members of Congress were away for the Christmas holiday, the Federal Reserve Act
was passed, setting up the Federal Reserve Corporation. In direct breach of the
constitution, the right to create credit was taken from Congress and vested in
the private Federal Reserve.
With the United States safely in the bag, the Money Power was free to use
World War One to destroy its last remaining effective opponent - the Russian
Empire under the Tsar and the old nobility - who had kept Russia independent. In
the last years of the Romanovs, Russia was rapidly becoming a very great power,
and while foreign bankers had large investments in the country, the growth was
financed without government borrowing from international banks. There was no
income tax, a small and shrinking National Debt, no unemployment, the biggest
gold reserve in the world, a constantly favourable balance of trade, and the
world's fastest annual industrial growth. Under these circumstances, it was
impossible for the Money Power to control Russia, except by destroying the
entire Tsarist system. Thus, coldly calculated financial interest added to
long-nurtured racial hatred of the best of the Russians to encourage various
Wall Street bankers to finance the genocidal 'revolution' by their Bolshevik
cousins which brought the Russian nation to disaster and slavery.
While such historical facts are not taught by the court historians of the
bankers' 'democratic' system, many prominent men have spoken out on this crucial
issue, and it is useful to repeat the comments of a few of them as an antidote
to the smear that critics of the banksters' swindle are 'cranks' with ideas
about 'funny money.'
Gladstone, for example, had this to say:-
|
"From the time I took office as Chancellor of the
Exchequer (1852) I began to learn that the State held, in face of
the Bank (of England) and the City [of London], an essentially false
position as to finance.... The hinge of the whole situation was
this: the Government itself was not to be a substantive power in
matters of finance, but was to leave the Money Power supreme and
unquestioned."
| |
His great rival, Benjamin Disraeli, cited Lionel Rothschild as saying:-
|
"Can anything be more absurd than that a nation
should apply to an individual to maintain its credit and, with its
credit, its existence as a state, and its comfort as a people."
| |
At about the same time, in 1875, the Lord Chief Justice of England, Sir
Alexander James Cockburn warned that:-
|
"The issue which has swept down the centuries and
which will have to be fought sooner or later, is the people versus
the banks."
| |
Several leading bankers themselves have also spelt out the situation with
admirable clarity. Mayer Amschel Rothschild, who founded the great international
banking house which took his name, stated bluntly:-
|
"Permit me to issue and control the money of a
nation, and I care not who makes its laws."
| |
The Rt. Hon. Reginald McKenna, one-time Chancellor of the Exchequer, and for
years the Chairman of the Midland Bank, in an address to the banks' shareholders
on January 25th, 1924, put it this way:-
|
"I am afraid that the ordinary citizen will not
like to be told that the banks can, and do, create and destroy
money. The amount of money in existence varies only with the actions
of the banks in increasing and decreasing deposits and bank
purchases.... and they who control the credit of a nation, direct
the policy of Governments and hold in the hollow of their hands the
destiny of the people."
| |
Sir Josiah Stamp, a director of the Bank of England, made the same point more
critically:-
|
"Banking was conceived in iniquity and born in sin.
Bankers own the world. Take it away from them, but leave them the
power to create money and control credit, and with a flick of the
pen they will create enough money to buy it back again."
| |
In 1964, the late Captain Henry Kerby MP put down two Motions in the House of
Commons to return the issue of money to Crown authority. These proposals
received the silent treatment from the politicians, the media and the rest of
the Establishment. A few years later he met with a premature death, and the
writer knows of others who also think that he was murdered.
It is interesting to note that President John F. Kennedy ordered the US
Treasury to issue four billion US dollars (not Federal Reserve dollars). These
were spent, not lent, into circulation, so that they did not add a cent to the
national debt. He was murdered shortly afterwards, as had been Abraham Lincoln,
who had tried a similar brave experiment.
It is quite impossible for anyone with reasonable intelligence to investigate
this subject without discovering facts like these. That being so, the only
possible conclusion is that the people who ought to know the truth, but who keep
silent, are quite determined to keep their eyes firmly shut.
It is obvious that a country cannot be sovereign unless its government is
in complete control of its credit. Yet the Euro-sceptics, who rightly point out
the dangers of allowing our money supply to be controlled by foreign and
unanswerable bankers in Brussels and Bonn, manage to ignore the equal danger of
leaving such power in the hands of unanswerable, and often foreign, bankers in
the City of London. This is what marks out their criticism of the EC as safety
valve politics; we must not miss any opportunity to point this out, and to win
over a people sickened and broken by a system based on debt, to the fight for a
real alternative.
|
"I set to work to read the Act of Parliament by
which the Bank of England was created. The investors knew what they
were about. Their design was to mortgage by degrees the whole of the
country.... lands.... houses.... property.... labour. The scheme has
produced what the world never saw before - starvation in the midst
of abundance."
Thus wrote William Cobbett in The Political Register
XVIII, July 14th, 1810.
| |
Back to Index
AWAKENINGS
Published and unpublished articles